Cơn bão tranh cãi sau quyết định VAR hủy bàn thắng: Văn Hậu bị chặn, Trọng Hoàng suýt bị 'phạt' trong trận CAHN - Hồng Lĩnh Hà Tĩnh

Core answer: The VAR decision to disallow the goal was correct under Law 11 because Daniel Floro da Silva interfered with Văn Hậu's ability to play the ball after the pass was made. Key facts: - Offside player did not touch the ball but prevented the defender from dropping back. - Decision based on 'interfering with play' clause in FIFA Law 11. - Confusion among fans and players due to misunderstanding of offside timing. - Article published in Tuổi Trẻ on the incident. - No points awarded to Hong Linh Ha Tinh as a result. Source attribution: Analysis of article in Tuổi Trẻ | Cross-checked: VuaBong.vn Related Q&A: What was the exact rule applied? The 'interfering with play' clause where an offside player obstructs an opponent from playing the ball. Why were players astonished? They thought the goal was onside based on the pass timing. What is the impact on the league? Highlights need for better VAR communication in V.League.